Anabolic AmplifiersIf you did not already know, testosterone is an important hormone in building lean muscle tissue. This is not a difficult task if one takes the time best anabolic amplifier get sufficient exercise, eat healthy and get sufficient rest everyday. The reward will be a leaner, stronger and healthier you. Anabolic Hormone Amplifier 1: Multi-Joint Movements It should come best anabolic amplifier no surprise that performing a lot of compound movements at best anabolic amplifier gym will greatly increase the levels of testosterone in your body. Compound exercises entail those movements which stress multiple muscle groups such as the squat, dead lift, bench press, dips, pull-ups and pushups. As a result of the tremendous stress your body undergoes when performing these exercises, your body is forced to increase levels of testosterone steroids before and after effects help you to cope with this situation.
Nutrex Research Anabol 5 Anabolic Amplifier Muscle Growth Capsules Count | eBay
First off — full disclosure: Something my readers can definitely count on: I refuse to sell anything that I think might waste their time and money. What are the claims? Wait a second… I thought food was something I needed to… um, stay alive? I thought it was kind of like oxygen in that sense.
In all seriousness, food is necessary for muscle growth. For these competitors, weeks of calorie restrictive dieting results in low to mid single-digit body fat percentages along with reduced glycogen and sodium-induced water retention. When normal eating is resumed, body weight typically shoots back up rather quickly.
Of course, anyone with his or her common sense faculties fully engaged will figure out that this weight gain is due to the muscles filling back up with glycogen, sodium, and water. And this can account for quite a bit of weight fluctuation. They say this is due to increased amounts of testosterone, insulin, and IGF-1 that accompany a sudden and drastic switch in calorie intake. This is actually nothing new.
Akerfeldt evidently based his hypothesis off a study led by G. Forbes and published in the AJCN. This body mass was gained without the test subjects engaging in exercise of any kind. The researchers believe that the increase in these anabolic hormones is what facilitated the gains in lean body mass.
On the surface, the results of this study can be exciting to natural bodybuilders. For example, in order to conclude that this study is relevant to bodybuilders, here are just a few of those assumptions: After all, resistance training results in increased lean body mass… right? Not necessarily; resistance training is initially catabolic. It only becomes anabolic when coupled with adequate recuperation between weight training bouts. In fact, overtraining with weights can even result in a reduction of endogenous testosterone production.
Hence, to extrapolate that lean body mass gains experienced by non-weight-training women would be equaled or bettered by hard training bodybuilders in the same circumstances is a big assumption. In fact, think about this: Moreover, it would need to have this effect repeatedly. It may well be that it does. However, a one-time doubling of anabolic hormones in non-weight-training individuals that just happened to all be women does not provide ample evidence that it does.
The theory goes something like this: When ancient man caught and ate some game, his body released muscle building enzymes and hormones to facilitate catching more game. These enzymes and hormones shuttled more glycogen and amino acids into the muscle cells.
This bodily anabolic environment, however, would only last for a couple of weeks. The body would quickly shift over to more of a fat-storing mode in order to protect man from the elements in the event that further game catches were not immediately forthcoming. The entire four-part interview has been posted online at this blog. Funny… I remember reading the interview in those magazine pages back then and being compelled by the content.
One has to wonder: Fueling this question is another observation. I saw that Torbjorn Akerfeldt mentioned in the interview that he was using the system himself. Phillips buttressed this claim by mentioning how developed the researcher was as a bodybuilder.
Admittedly, the absence of it is neither here nor there as disproof of his system. However, the discovery of one would constitute some nice supporting anecdotal evidence of its efficacy. As mentioned at the beginning of this article, I reserve a qualified skepticism about this system.
If this were true, the method would have taken off in the s and the side effects of steroids would have long been in the ash heap. Stick to these lifts: I am 19 years old 5'9'' lbs. I don't want to be incredibly huge but no strength though! I just want to prepare for Marine OCS which is like in 2 years. Somanabolic Muscle Maximizer December 21, at Is there such a thing?
Is there some science that backs up their claims? The hormonal response would happen repeatedly even though the study results were from a one-time, three-week period. The hormonal response would be the same or better if resistance training were added to the formula. The lean mass gains would be the same or better if resistance training were added to the formula.